Cook Good, Cook Bad, Cook as Expected

Good Series:

India Away – 2012/13

Australia Home – 2015

As expected Series:

Australia Home – 2013

India Home – 2014

New Zealand Away – 2013

Bad Series:

West Indies Away – 2015

Australia Away – 2013/14

NZ Home – 2015

Sri Lanka Home – 2014

Posted in Miscellaneous Cricketing Thoughts | 1 Comment

Queen Mother teaches young Queen how to signal byes

The queen salute

Posted in Miscellaneous Cricketing Thoughts, Social Media Cricket | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

snappy snappy, ashes

DSC00053 DSC00051 DSC00050 DSC00047 DSC00046 DSC00044 DSC00042 DSC00041 DSC00040 DSC00039 DSC00036 DSC00037 DSC00030 DSC00032 DSC00033 DSC00029 DSC00024 DSC00023 DSC00022 DSC00019 DSC00014 DSC00011 DSC00018

Posted in Miscellaneous Cricketing Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

that poor excuse for a journalist, Simon Hughes’s latest article


I.S.Hughes’ take on KP. In it he genuinely questions KP’s mental strength for Test cricket!!! PMSL!

Originally posted on sebsmar:

Last updated at 12:01AM, May 21 2015

‘I’ factor rules out Kevin Pietersen from being part of the team

Alastair Cook declared yesterday that he was not consulted on the fate of Kevin Pietersen. In truth, he didn’t need to be. Pietersen’s unsuitability for continuing as an England player is all laid out in black and white and Technicolor, if only even his staunchest supporters could see it.

Test cricket is an X-ray of the brain. It is an examination of character as much as it is of talent and technique. It exposes your anxieties, magnifies your emotions, tests your mettle. Five days of intense competition ask you such fundamental questions as: “Do you think you have the right to be out here?” and: “Do you have what it takes?” It is a test of mental strength, of desire, of total commitment. It is sport…

View original 704 more words

Posted in Miscellaneous Cricketing Thoughts | Leave a comment

Key: We Must Trust

Kiwi Mistrust    NZ cricket

The New Zealand cricket board sacked their best batsman as captain not very long ago. Here’s some quotes:

Mike Hesson, NZ coach, to Ross Taylor:

“Ross, we believe you to be a follower rather than a leader. When the tour finishes you will no longer be captain of the team in any format.”

Mike Hesson, NZ coach, to the media:

“In terms of planning from series to series it’s extremely difficult, to look after your own game and worry about that of the team. Therefore my recommendation was for Ross to stay on as Test captain and focus on that, and also focus on his batting in all three forms, and for Brendon to come in as leader of the one-day and T20 squads.”

Shane Bond, NZ bowling coach, in privately ‘leaked’ letter:

“I believe the coach has been dishonest in his assertion around the miscommunication of the captaincy split with Ross. At no time in my conversations with Mike Hesson, that mostly included Bob Carter and/or the manager, was the captaincy split ever discussed. It was clear to me that Ross Taylor was to be removed from all three formats.”

Ross Taylor, when asked if the NZ board were lying about the offer of Test captaincy:


Key: We take a poll; Oh jeez!  NZ cricket

The New Zealand cricket board were swift in organising a review of their process. Following the review, there was no circling of wagons, just honesty. Here’s more quotes:

NZ Chairman Chris Moller apologises for the shambolic way his board handled the sacking:

“The board has reviewed all aspects of the captaincy issue and wishes to publicly place on record its apologies to Ross Taylor and his family for the manner in which events have unfolded. There were a number of significant shortcomings and the New Zealand Cricket board and chief executive take full responsibility for these.”

NZ Chairman admits errors made:

“There are no hanging offences in all of this. Yes, the ball’s been dropped, absolutely. Could we have done things better? Absolutely. Are we going to learn from those mistakes, well we hope so.”

NZ Chairman Chris Moller builds bridges to reach out to Ross Taylor:

“The board fully understands Ross Taylor’s reasons for not going to South Africa and sincerely hopes that as our current best batsman, Ross will be available for the English tour this summer.”

Back to Ross Taylor:

“I appreciate the apology from NZC. Keen to put it behind me and looking forward to getting back with the team soon.”

Key: We Skyrocket  NZ cricket

The NZ team moved on very rapidly. The side greatly improved. Ross Taylor resumed his run-scoring exploits. The new captain had Taylor’s full support. Things got more cohesive, the side were able to trust each other and play more aggressive cricket, things got better:

  • New Zealand have risen from eighth in the Test rankings and ninth in the ODI rankings to third in both formats.
  • New Zealand reached the World Cup final for the first time in their history earlier this year. McCullum was one of five NZ players in the team of the tournament.

 New Zealand: Bold, aggressive, exciting…and not afraid of talent.

  1. Could England have handled this situation as poorly as New Zealand did?
  2. Would England have been as honest and as fair in their public response as New Zealand?!
  3. Will England go on an upwards or downwards curve from here on in?!!
  4. Are any of these questions even relevant?!!!

Good luck to New Zealand tomorrow! 

Posted in International Cricket | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Step Forward In Time: An Interview with Dave Richardson – 2023

It is rare that my blog gets scoops of any sort – let alone a scoop that saw me travel to the future, speak openly to the long-serving Chief Exec of the ICC, and happen to jot down everything he said, word for word. Here’s the transcript:

This is your third World Cup as ICC chief executive. What kind of tournament do you foresee?
An exciting one. For two reasons. There are at least two teams that have a realistic chance of even winning the tournament if everything goes their way. This is the first time two teams have a reasonable chance. Secondly, the playing conditions that we have for ODI cricket at the moment have led to a far more attacking game, certainly from a batting point of view with no fielders allowed outside the circle. But also from a bowling and captaincy point of view, with the new ball for each over – the days where bowlers and captains could rely on containment and trying to keep the batsmen quiet have gone. The only way that is possible now is to take wickets. And that has lead to far more attacking captaincy and an attacking style of bowling, manipulating cyber systems and using hacked DRS/umpire Steve Davis to take wickets, rather than preserving runs.

But once again the structure of the World Cup has generated a debate. Was there any other alternative?
After the 2019 World Cup people were of the view that the structure worked well and there was no reason to change it in the short term and to give it another go: instead we figured that the best way was 8 teams, with one group of 8, and then all 8 making the quarter-finals. The focus has been to make sure all matches are as competitive as possible. And, hence, for the Full Members like the West Indies and Bangladesh that have qualified for this event – we have spent a lot of time and a lot of money in putting together worthwhile preparation programmes for those teams to give them every chance of giving a good account of themselves at the World Cup.

Do you think there will ever be an “ideal” World Cup, or are there too many conflicting views/demands?
The fact that the ICC Board has recently created the opportunity for the West Indies, New Zealand and Bangladesh to progress through the World Cricket League ranks, get to the World Cricket Championships and then progress effectively into the ODI FTP and therefore qualify for the 2023 World Cup has allowed us to move to a eight-team event. The aim is to make the major events as competitive as possible. Every match should be very competitive and having eight teams at the 2023 World Cup will make sure that will be the case.

On the other hand, shrinking a premier event to eight teams – is that not going against the ICC’s own policy on development of the game?
It would if we were definitively precluding the rubbish Full Members like the West Indies and Bangladesh from qualifying or finding a route directly in to compete with the good Full Members in bilateral cricket. But by creating that pathway it has enabled us to kill two birds with one stone. Firstly, it has expanded the opportunities for the rubbish Full Members to play at the highest level through bilateral series. Secondly, the World Cup itself, the premium event, without exception should be played between teams that are evenly matched and competitive.

Why then does a relegation rule only apply to the rubbish Full Member teams and not if a good Full Member ended up in the last place in the ODI rankings?
It is a step-by-step process. The governance structure of the ICC is such that we have got good Full Members, a few rubbish Full Members (West Indies and Bangladesh), and obviously ODI members – I can’t remember who these are any more. The reason that there are good Full Members is because they have a cricket economy as cricket-playing countries. There has been significant investment in those countries. So it makes sense to allow them to continue play each other bilaterally. Proper promotion and relegation [of  the good Full Members] might be a step for the future, but at this stage it is too early to contemplate that.

How can the ICC ensure that the two useless Full Member teams get sufficient fixtures in order to guarantee the credibility of the new rankings structure?
We will do our best to facilitate those fixtures. Part of the strategy that we want to follow going forward is, ‘Let us give the West Indies and Bangladesh the opportunity to help themselves.’ It is not all about the ICC handing them everything on a plate. Yes, we will be in a position with the new funding model to allocate them a lot more money than they were previously getting from the ICC. But having got those funds it is for them to help themselves.

Will the next World Cup really be any different from the Champions Trophy – eight teams compared to eight?
The Champions Trophy, the second major event in the ODI format, is much shorter, played over a two-to-three-week period. The World Cup, with the one group of 8, followed by quarter finals with all 8, is longer. Effectively it is the top eight teams playing. What it does allow us to do is create more context for the rankings. It is just as easy to qualify for a long eight-team tournament as a short eight-team tournament, especially given the levels of performance of the West Indies and Bangladesh recently.

With thanks to ESPN.

Posted in International Cricket, Miscellaneous Cricketing Thoughts | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The “Available Cricketers Not At The World Cup” XI

Kevin Pietersen (c) – 9 ODI tons and an average of 41. Capable of something very special, on the biggest occasions, and against the very best. A frankly mind-boggling omission.

Jonathan Trott – Who else in the world averages in excess of 50 with the bat in ODI cricket, was available to play, and was left out of their national team squad? When England were trying to build their ‘platform’ stuff around Cook (average mid 30s), I do wonder if selection meetings ever had that awkward moment where Trott’s identical strike rate but massively superior average was ever brought up.

Usman Khawaja – Although Khawaja seems to only ever get picked when he’s in rotten form but Australia are desperate, he probably deserved to play some ODI cricket ahead of some of his rivals recently (Henriques?). Khawaja averaged nearly 75 in Australia’s List A tournament this winter and topped the runs scored list with 523 in just 7 innings. Who said I never do any research for this blog?

Ryan ten Doeschate – the Dutch/Saffer biffer has an ODI batting average of 67 in 30 matches, and his knocks aren’t just minnow bashing – they include a ton against England and a half century against South Africa.

Samit Patel – No wrong’un XI is complete without a mention of Samit Patel. It is a non-negotiable slot, so accept it. He smacks it, nurdles it, tweaks it, and quite apart from all that, he is the opposite of Joe Root. Perfect.

Yuvraj Singh – I can see why he has been left out, as Yuvraj has a pretty mediocre record in Oceania overall, however the man has 13 ODI centuries to his name and is only 33. He bowls a bit, once smashed 6 sixes in an over off Stuart Broad, and also reminds me a little bit of Samit Patel – which is something I’m sure he’d be delighted to hear.

Sam Billings – Usually when I’m struggling for a player in an XI, I will turn to the County game. Billings isn’t quite that desperate a shout, as his 58 ball 135 against Somerset suggests some serious talent and hitting power down the order. He gets in ahead of the unfortunate Wesley Barresi of the Netherlands, who will no doubt be gutted.

Dwayne Bravo – he’s a handy ‘death’ bowler, who can hold a bat, if not swing it particularly successfully – although he has scored an ODI ton against both England and New Zealand. I’m principally picking this guy on IPL experience, and to bowl overs 48 and 50.

Ryan Harris – Rhino has an ODI bowling average of 18.90, roughly half that of Pat Cummins. Australia’s thought process is that they want to keep him for Test cricket, but on the 50 over format’s biggest stage, I know who I would rather have in my side as a captain.

Sunil Narine – Dry up the middle overs with this West Indian man of mystery. His economy rate of 4.10, given the era in which he is playing, is remarkable. He might have picked a good tournament to skip, given the West Indies many issues.

Saeed Ajmal – The number one rated ODI bowler in the world, and a good man to ‘chuck’ a ball to. I’m rushing this article because it is surely just a matter of time before a Pakistani player treads on a ball and Ajmal is conveniently on hand to take his place.

(with apologies sent, but not limited, to: Shiv Chanderpaul, Ben Stokes, Ajantha Mendis)

Posted in Hypothetical XIs, International Cricket | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment